Latest Posts

A Blueprint for Expansion: Structuring UK Brands for the Indian Market

The next wave of British growth will not come from new products but from new jurisdictions. For UK brands, India represents a paradox: a market of unmatched scale, yet a legal environment that penalises haste. The challenge is not entry but execution, how to transplant a UK governance framework into a jurisdiction defined by procedural intensity, overlapping regulators, and rapid digitalisation. The firms that succeed will treat legal architecture as commercial strategy, not compliance cost.

I. The strategic context: post Brexit bilateralism

The UK’s trade policy now leans on bilateral corridors. The UK and India Free Trade Agreement, signed in July 2025 but pending ratification, will eventually set a template for services mobility, data standards, and cross border taxation. For now, entry into India still depends on sector specific foreign investment rules, the Companies Act 2013, and FEMA’s capital control regime. British boards must therefore approach India not through the lens of emerging market risk but as a rules-based jurisdiction where legal form is commercial advantage.

India’s legal environment is moving closer to the UK’s. Corporate filings are digital, directors are identifiable through national KYC systems, and enforcement is increasingly data driven. This convergence allows UK brands to operate in a familiar governance ecosystem, but only if they maintain structural precision from the start.

II. Structuring with discipline: law as market entry strategy

The fundamental decision is the choice of legal vehicle. A wholly owned subsidiary remains the most robust model for brand protection, tax efficiency, and repatriation. It allows control over intellectual property, consistent transfer pricing arrangements, and eligibility for India’s 22% corporate tax rate under section 115BAA.

UK counsel should treat incorporation not as a procedural act but as a constitutional one. Every clause in the Articles of Association should reflect brand control, ownership, and board independence. Shareholder agreements must integrate UK corporate principles such as reserved matters, drag and tag rights, and director duties while remaining enforceable under Indian law. Many entrants rely on informal joint ventures that collapse once regulatory filings or ownership disputes arise.

Franchising and distribution models often appear simpler but create the opposite result: brand dilution, tax leakage through mischaracterised royalties, and unmanageable consumer liabilities. In the post Finance Act 2023 landscape, where India taxes royalties and technical fees at 20% subject to treaty relief, these structures can erode margins faster than any logistics cost.

III. Building people infrastructure: compliant mobility as competitive advantage

India’s demographics are an asset, but mobility rules are unforgiving. Without a social security agreement between the UK and India, every British assignee becomes liable to India’s Employees Provident Fund regime with a 12% contribution on full pay. Employment visas require a minimum salary of USD 25,000 and registration with the Foreigners Regional Registration Office.

Secondments must be drafted with precision. The Supreme Court’s Northern Operating Systems judgment classifies many inbound secondments as taxable manpower supply, creating GST and permanent establishment exposure. The best structures use dual contracts, Indian employment for operational control and UK employment for benefits continuity, and treat tax equalisation as an upfront budgeting exercise rather than a remedial cost.

UK brands should pre-empt mobility issues at the group policy level. Expatriate frameworks must reconcile UK employment protections, Indian payroll tax, and corporate residence tests. Compliance here directly influences profitability. A clean mobility strategy prevents double taxation, reduces payroll friction, and preserves managerial credibility with regulators.

IV. Governance and compliance: synchronising two legal systems

Expansion is now a governance challenge. India’s Significant Beneficial Ownership rules mirror the UK’s register of persons with significant control. Both demand transparency of ownership above 10%. Directors must complete identity verification under both the UK Companies House reforms effective November 2025 and India’s DIN based KYC systems. Boards that harmonise filings and maintain mirrored registers across jurisdictions avoid anti money laundering discrepancies that can stall banking or licensing.

Anti bribery procedures under the UK Bribery Act 2010 must extend into India’s procurement and state licensing framework. India’s Prevention of Corruption Act now penalises commercial bribery, and enforcement collaboration between agencies is increasing. Embedding adequate procedures into Indian operations is both lawful protection and market signal.

On data, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 introduces accountability similar to GDPR, while India’s CERT In requires incident reporting within 6 hours. UK brands must treat these as operational metrics. The UK Information Commissioner’s 72 hour window is no defence in India. Integrating incident response across both jurisdictions, using standardised encryption, retention, and audit trail protocols, turns compliance into reputational capital.

V. Profitability through legal precision

The primary cost of entry is regulatory friction. Every delay in registration, taxation, or data clearance converts into working capital loss. A structure that anticipates both UK and Indian compliance regimes delivers margins.

Key profitability levers are legal, not operational:

• Repatriation clarity through the India and UK tax treaty, using Form 10F and tax residence certificates to secure 10–15% withholding instead of 20%.
• Transfer pricing coherence using contemporaneous benchmarking under both OECD and Indian rules to prevent double adjustment.
• Data localisation avoidance by maintaining processing within permissible geographies and evidencing lawful transfer safeguards.
• Permanent establishment neutrality through contracts that keep control, risk, and remuneration within the Indian entity.

These factors define whether a UK patent records profits in London or defers them indefinitely in India.

VI. The advisory opportunity

Law firms and professional advisers now play a central role in translating UK governance standards into Indian enforceability. The task is multidisciplinary, combining immigration law, tax structuring, data compliance, and corporate governance. The real value lies in coordination, ensuring that the same narrative is defensible before the UK’s HMRC, Companies House, as before India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Reserve Bank, and tax authorities.

For UK legal counsel, assisting brands to enter India requires a shift in mindset. India is not an exotic risk but a mirror market that demands British rigour in a different idiom. Advisory quality is measured by structural resilience, not volume of filings.

VII. The new tradecraft of expansion

The post Brexit British economy will depend on legal engineers as much as marketers. The India corridor is the proving ground. Brands that move first with coherent legal structures, clean shareholding, local governance, mobility compliance, and integrated data strategy will not only survive but set the benchmark for international expansion.

In an age where regulation defines market access, legality is brand strategy. The firms that internalise this will discover that compliance is not an obstacle to growth in India, it is the mechanism through which growth becomes sustainable.

Read More

The $100,000 Question: Why US Tech Needs a UK Base Now

When President Trump signed off on a $100,000 fee for every new H-1B visa petition last weekend, the ripple effect was immediate. Investors asked whether startups could still afford to bring in overseas engineers. HR directors scrambled to recalculate hiring budgets. And for global talents, the designers, coders and data scientists who have long seen Silicon Valley as the promised land the message was unmistakable: the United States is no longer the easy first choice.

The H-1B has always been political football, but this change marks something different. It transforms the cost base of hiring, and in doing so, it forces US tech firms to ask a bigger strategic question: where else can they build teams, attract world-class people, and still connect seamlessly with their American operations?

The answer, increasingly, is London.

Why London?

The UK has positioned itself, almost by accident, as the most natural hedge against US immigration volatility. Visa fees are not insignificant, but they are predictable. There is no lottery. A sponsor licence can be secured in weeks, and once you have it, visas for new hires can be processed just as quickly.

For companies used to rolling the dice each March on the H-1B lottery, that certainty is transformative. It means talent strategy can be planned rather than prayed for.

The timing also matters. London sits in the sweet spot between California and Bangalore, overlapping with both in a single working day. For distributed teams and round-the-clock development cycles, that time zone advantage is worth almost as much as a tax break.

More Than a Safety Net

It would be a mistake to see the UK only as a fallback for those priced out of the H-1B. The country has been quietly redesigning its immigration system with tech in mind.

The Skilled Worker route, while more expensive than it once was, offers stability and a path to settlement. The Global Talent visa endorsed by Tech Nation remains one of the most flexible unsponsored routes in the world. And the Scale-up visa is designed for precisely the kind of high-growth firms that usually cluster in San Francisco or New York.

Combine those options with London’s financial markets, venture ecosystem and cultural cachet, and the UK starts to look less like a Plan B and more like a genuine alternative centre of gravity.

The Cost Argument

The hard numbers tell their own story. Sponsoring a skilled worker in the UK involves licence fees, an immigration health surcharge, and the visa itself. For a five-year hire, the all-in cost is measured in the low tens of thousands of pounds. Compare that with a flat $100,000 fee before you even pay wages in the United States, and the business case begins to write itself.

The fee will not deter the largest tech companies, who can absorb it as a cost of doing business. But for mid-sized players and scale-ups the very firms most responsible for innovation and job creation it could be fatal. A UK office is no longer just a growth play, it is a survival strategy.

The Strategic Pivot

What we are seeing is a shift in mindset. For decades, the default was simple: if you wanted to scale in tech, you built in the US and dealt with immigration headaches as best you could. Now the calculation is different. A physical footprint in the UK is a release valve: a place to hire international talent without political whiplash, a platform to reach European markets, and a credible base that investors understand.

This does not mean abandoning America. The US market, capital and ecosystem are still unrivalled. But the smartest companies are already thinking in terms of dual anchors: Silicon Valley for scale, London for stability.

Conclusion

The $100,000 H-1B fee has turned a visa into a luxury product. For the companies who cannot justify that spend on every new engineer or product lead, the UK offers a rational, strategic alternative.

The firms that move early, incorporating, licensing, and embedding compliance in London will have a head start. They will be able to keep hiring globally while their competitors are paralysed by costs in the US.

The message is clear: if you are a US tech company serious about resilience, you no longer just want a UK presence. You need one.

Get in touch with our Corporate Immigration team via the form below.

Read More

A Quiet Exodus: Why More Americans Are Migrating to the UK

The United Kingdom is witnessing an unprecedented rise in immigration from the United States. In the twelve months leading to March 2025, more than 6,600 US citizens applied for UK residency or nationality. This is the highest figure since records began in 2004. Over 1,900 applications were lodged in the first quarter of this year alone, reflecting a twelve percent increase on the previous quarter.

Why are more Americans moving to the UK

This trend, while modest in absolute numbers, is gaining prominence due to the profile of those making the move. Immigration lawyers and policy commentators attribute the surge to growing political volatility in the US, particularly following the return of Donald Trump to office. Many applicants are affluent professionals, entrepreneurs, and families seeking long-term stability, access to education, or a more predictable political climate.

Some have been referred to as “Donald Dashers,” a term used to describe Americans relocating capital and assets to UK institutions in search of security. Others include LGBTQ+ individuals, dual nationals, and members of minority groups who are concerned about the evolving tone of US public discourse and policymaking.

UK Education as a positive driver

Education remains a key driver. Applications for UK study visas from US nationals rose by nearly ten percent in the first quarter of 2025, reinforcing Britain’s appeal as an academic and cultural hub. London in particular continues to attract US students and professionals looking for global opportunity. 

The UK’s Immigration landscape

From a legal perspective, several viable routes remain open. The Skilled Worker visa, Global Talent route, and Family visa pathway continue to draw applicants from the US. Notably, recent reforms have expanded eligibility for those with UK-born grandparents. At the same time, proposals under the Labour government aim to tighten immigration generally, including increasing the residency requirement for settlement from five to ten years and raising English language thresholds.

Although net migration to the UK has fallen from a peak of 906,000 in 2023 to 431,000 in 2024, the demand from well-qualified US nationals is growing. Grants of UK citizenship rose to 269,000 in the past year, and employment-related settlements increased by over a third.

Final remarks

While political rhetoric in the UK continues to emphasise control and reduction of migration, the legal frameworks remain robust. For a particular class of American citizen, Britain continues to offer an attractive combination of legal certainty, global connectivity, and long-term security.

Read More